Readings
Statistician Heal Thyself: Have We Lost the Plot?
Gordon, I., & Finch, S. (2015). Statistician Heal Thyself: Have We Lost the Plot? Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics: A Joint Publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 24(4), 1210–1229.
- this is an article about graphics in science and statistics journals
I think graphical display of data is much easier to parse than tabled data
- but many (applied) journals specify a maximum of figures per article!
a high quality graph should be able to be interpreted without elaboration
Figure 1 shows a cluttered display
- I think there\’s a ggplot2 function to push labels apart
- yes, here it is: ggrepel
Figure 2 provides a redesign
- basically a small multiples plot
- this is an improvement, but if the relationship is not monotone, then this figure would look a bit messy
Figure 3 provides a scatterplot alternative
- the authors suggest that it is easy to see that average lifespan increases with education, but I find this difficult
- I can more easily see the decrease in lifespan variation with increasing education though
Principle 3:
Use good alignment on a common scale for quantities to be compared.
- pie charts and stacked bar charts fail this principle
- stacked bar charts because only one category (the bottom one) is aligned against the common axis
- panel plots also fail this?
- pie charts and stacked bar charts fail this principle
The figures in the article themselves are fuzzy
- perhaps the authors could have taken their own advice?!
Detection was found to be the main issue
- This refers to how we find out about features of the graph
They provide a checklist at the end of the article for those producing graphics